Those new Retinue cavalry...

[Colonel Kilgore]

... are even better in the flesh. I collected mine yesterday and they are stunning little figures.

Simon

[Sean Clark]

I'll  add these to my Weekender order.

[Leman (Andy)]

I am busy compiling a birthday order. 70 deserves something special, and those little guys will fit the bill.

[Rar418]

Are they smaller than the old models? The new commanders and infantry are smaller the old models and cannot be mixed. very disappointing.

[martin goddard]

Indeed they are slimmer, albeit the same height.
My sculpting style has changed a little over the years, sorry.
I mix them all in the ramies I play with.

martin

[Sean Clark]

Are they smaller than the old models? The new commanders and infantry are smaller the old models and cannot be mixed. very disappointing.

Can not be mixed is a very definite  statement.  I have some of these figures amd have mixed them without loss of enjoyment.

But like the 'Not my King' types, we are all allowed an opinion. 

Happy gaming. 😊

[Leman (Andy)]

I am definitely of the all people are not the same size school of thought. I happily mix old and new PP, Ancient and Modern Miniatures, Essex, Irregular and a few Minifigs into my WotR armies. Indeed the current unit of Welsh spears I am working on is a mix of Irregular and Essex. Also, it should be borne in mind that as sculptors develop their skills their figure style is likely to change. The Perry figures for Wargames Foundry WotR are smaller than their current range. Similarly their latest foray into the FPW has resulted in slightly bigger figures than their current WotR range, and veritable giants compared to their Foundry FPW range, but I have seen those happily mixed in armies on the web, although admittedly in discrete units. As a reminder, here is my Duke of York command base again:



Front three figures are new Peter Pig, armoured figure with halberd is old Peter Pig, standard bearer in gambeson is Ancient and Modern. I would suggest that at wargamers distance these figures do not look disappointing together.

[Colonel Kilgore]

I would suggest that at wargamers distance these figures do not look disappointing together.

Andy,

I would suggest that even at the magnification of your photo, these figures do not look disappointing together 

Simon

[Sean Clark]

What is the antonym of disappointing?

Examples are:

satisfied delighted fulfilled pleased content contented happy cheerful comforted heartened thankful gruntled blissful

[Colonel Kilgore]

I found online the antonym: "awesomazing". It might not be a proper word, but I think I like it 

Simon

[Sean Clark]

We'll  all be using it next week Simon.  You just need to get onto TokTik to make it viral.

[John Watson]

Sean "Thesaurus" Clark!
John

[Sean Clark]

I've been called many things John  but thats a first!

Or should I say:

earliest
initial
opening
introductory
original
fundamental
basic
rudimentary
primary
beginning
elemental
underlying
basal
foundation
key
cardinal
central
chief
vital
essential
foremost
principal
highest
greatest
paramount
top
topmost
utmost
uppermost
prime
chief
leading
main
major
pre-eminent
overriding
outstanding
supreme
premier
predominant
prevailing
most important
of greatest importance
of prime importance
vital
key
essential
crucial
central
core
focal
pivotal
dominant
ruling
head
number-one
best
superlative
winner's
winning
champion


😅🤣😂

[Leman (Andy)]

Totally bananas chaps.

[Colonel Kilgore]

Sorry Sean, I don't understand. Can you say all that another way, please? 

Simon