Print Page - Some 'irks' in the current rules

Title: Some 'irks' in the current rules
Post by: SimonC on February 03, 2023, 01:30:29 PM

I'll just put these here for whenever a new version comes along.

MGs holding objectives
P26 - last paragraph
1st line says yes, 2nd line says no

Scenery Layout
Perhaps some more restrictions on placing templates. We see some players deploy all terrain on one side of the table , risking 'null' games

Assigning Hits in Assault.
Whether hits should be allowed in units not assaulting - currently yes - but perhaps dubious

Title: Re: Some 'irks' in the current rules
Post by: martin goddard on February 04, 2023, 07:46:15 AM

Ok thanks Simon.
The next set of rules tp be done is PBI but maybe there can be some clarfications.
Once I start pulling things apart I fnd it difficult to stop. :-[

martin :)

Title: Re: Some 'irks' in the current rules
Post by: Colonel Kilgore on February 04, 2023, 08:12:22 AM

Very true, Martin!

I would vote to keep things as they are with the rules (which I feel it would be a shame to pull apart) and provide some official clarifications/addenda.

Simon

Title: Re: Some 'irks' in the current rules
Post by: SimonC on February 04, 2023, 08:21:30 AM

I agree with the Captain. I don't really want a new deconstructed version. Just some tightening up and a few adjustments

Title: Re: Some 'irks' in the current rules
Post by: John Watson on February 04, 2023, 08:42:49 AM

Just as well that you are not a surgeon. Can you imagine...........The good news, Mrs Smith, is that we have removed your husband's appendix, but we seem to have mislaid his left leg when we put him back together again.
John

RFCM

Rules => Square Bashing => Squarebashing Next Edition => Topic started by: SimonC on February 03, 2023, 01:30:29 PM