RFCM

Rules => Civil War Battles => Topic started by: martin goddard on March 30, 2021, 05:31:15 PM

Title: Contentious bayonet issue
Post by: martin goddard on March 30, 2021, 05:31:15 PM
Do you prefer your American civil war infantry to have bayonet fixed or not.
This may cause temperatures to rise, so take it easy  chaps.

martin :)
Title: Re: Contentious bayonet issue
Post by: Leslie BT on March 30, 2021, 08:28:43 PM
No sheathed. Safer there.
Title: Re: Contentious bayonet issue
Post by: SimonC on March 30, 2021, 08:35:23 PM
No sticky out bits on any figure gets my vote
Title: Re: Contentious bayonet issue
Post by: pbeccas (Paul) on March 30, 2021, 11:03:25 PM
Bayonets fixed please.
Title: Re: Contentious bayonet issue
Post by: Colonel Kilgore on March 30, 2021, 11:11:07 PM
Maybe cold steel showing for the real men, and rather less so for those of poorer quality?

[I hope the hedging of bets here is not too obvious...].

Simon
Title: Re: Contentious bayonet issue
Post by: sukhe_bator (Neil) on March 31, 2021, 08:33:47 AM
Possibly a compromise? Since bayonets impeded reloading, if your forces rarely used them then don't represent them on the table but
a) count fixed bayonets in the add-on effects of a charge
or
b) have a few stands of charging figures with bayonets to substitute at the appropriate moment for visual effect.
Title: Re: Contentious bayonet issue
Post by: Wardy64 on March 31, 2021, 08:43:05 AM
Forward corporal Jones - but don't panic!

Dave
Title: Re: Contentious bayonet issue
Post by: Colonel Kilgore on March 31, 2021, 08:50:40 AM
Quote from: sukhe_bator (Neil) on March 31, 2021, 08:33:47 AM

b) have a few stands of charging figures with bayonets to substitute at the appropriate moment for visual effect.

That's got to be a winner for Martin - more figures required, chaps!

Simon
Title: Re: Contentious bayonet issue
Post by: Leman (Andy) on April 03, 2021, 04:34:16 PM
As far as I know bayonets were only fixed prior to a charge because they were a bloody nuisance in a firefight. I prefer bayonets absent.
Title: Re: Contentious bayonet issue
Post by: sukhe_bator (Neil) on April 03, 2021, 04:46:34 PM
Just as well it's not AWI, plug bayonets prevented fire altogether! Offset socket bayonets were still a pain to reload around throughout the C19 with muzzle loading firearms.
Title: Re: Contentious bayonet issue
Post by: Ben Waterhouse on April 05, 2021, 02:08:25 PM
Quote from: sukhe_bator (Neil) on April 03, 2021, 04:46:34 PM
Just as well it's not AWI, plug bayonets prevented fire altogether! Offset socket bayonets were still a pain to reload around throughout the C19 with muzzle loading firearms.

Plug bayonets in the AWI? I don't think that's right. As far as I recall plug bayonets went out by the War of the Spanish Succession, 70 years earlier.
Title: Re: Contentious bayonet issue
Post by: sukhe_bator (Neil) on April 05, 2021, 02:18:21 PM
Given the poor battlefield performance of f/l muzzle loaders you'd be forgiven for wondering if making it possible to actually fire them was a retrograde step!